The Double Movement - Karl Polyani

an illustration, a stop motion movie of the double movement explained by Karl Polyani in his book,
The Great Transformation.
The concept of Embeddedness and Non-embeddedness of social life throughout history and its pattern is studied here. I have tried to hypothesize the current events and their link to the Double Movement.
My Role
Storyteller, Illustrator
Researcher
Targets
Economists
Business Futurists
Timeline
4 weeks
October 2021
Coach
Koray Caliskan
The new School
Tools
Wood, Paper, Ink
Research, Economy, History

Karl Polanyi introduces the concept of Embeddedness which necessarily says that it is a human tendency to determine economic decisions through social relationships, cultural values, religion and other social aspects. These are embedded with the economy but have no economic importance or relevance. He says “ Man’s economy ... is submerged in his social relationships. He does not act so as to safeguard his individual interest in the possession of material goods; he acts so as to safeguard his social standing, his social claims, his social assets. He values material goods only insofar as they serve this end. Economic system runs on noneconomic motives ”
​
Although he says that the functioning of an economy cannot be disassociated from the social world in which it was embedded, but, under capitalism and neoliberal world, the economy became disembedded from society for expansion and reach. This self-regulating market controls and overpowers it. This was not a spontaneous emergence, but was a non-intentional consequence of individual action. Polanyi says that the free market reforms try to create fictitious commodities, like land, labor and money which were made, designed and maintained. This free market tries to move away from the society but another part of the society will have a counter movement by trying to re-embed the economy with society. Involving social relations/aspects can be purely on situational basis, as a defence or for a support. Economic decisions are exclusive of social and cultural constructs. It becomes difficult to unembed the social relationships from the modern economy without understanding the underlying intent and the psychology of the controlled society.


The double movement acts as a tool to understand this dynamic-swaying pattern of the economy between social(embeddedness) and market(disembeddedness). The uneven consideration of historical events and their geographical occurrence does not justify the movement, evenly.
​
Capitalists and the society try to leverage the process of embedding and disembedding social relations from the economy. My proposal is to use this tool(The Double Movement) to understand the underlying intentions and the possible outcomes of such global events in an ever changing world.
